U.S. Department Оf Justice Releases Cryptocurrency Enforcement Framework

  • The framework will serve as grounds to bring more regulation into the growing crypto sector.
  • Officials urge members of the industry to work together with regulators in order to set fair rules that will allow for the safe development of blockchain technology.
The northern facade of the Department of Justice

The northern facade of the Department of Justice building in Washinton, DC, USA, photographed on April 22, 2019. Christopher Zimmer/Shutterstock

On October 8, The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) released an enforcement framework report on cryptocurrency, which reveals how officials plan to deal with future regulation in the industry.

The report is structured in three separate parts, each one describing the difficulties of how certain blockchain illicit activities could cause harm to the public. The first part reviews financial transactions for commissioned crimes, money laundering and shielding from tax reporting, and hacks or theft of digital assets, while the second and third explore various enforcement tools that could be used to prevent such crimes.

According to the researchers, the growing DeFi space requires increased regulation as today’s activity in the sphere is steadily growing.

“Even in societies where transformative scientific and technological advancements are achievable, public policy again plays a critical mediating role. In the wrong hands, or without appropriate safeguards and oversight, these advancements can facilitate great human suffering,” the report says.

And while the report acknowledges the potential of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology and its growing adoption, officials expressed their caution of possible security threats. They urge members of the industry to work together with regulators in order to find common grounds on which to further develop this technology without endangering public safety.

“To promote public safety and protect national security, all stakeholders – from private industry to regulators, elected officials, and individual cryptocurrency users – will need to take steps to ensure cryptocurrency is not used as a platform for illegality. Indeed, for cryptocurrency to realize its truly transformative potential, it is imperative that these risks be addressed.”

The report also brings up the question of whether cryptocurrencies should be viewed as a type of virtual currencies as they are based on blockchains and decentralization and do not directly represent value.

Probably the topic which is surrounded by the most controversy is the issue of the rising criminal activity that may involve crypto. This topic ranges from questionable ICOs to the funding of anti-government organizations that promote violence on a global scale.

“Innovations in technology often change the world for the better. And yet, criminals, terrorists, and rogue states can use those same innovations for their own illegitimate ends, imposing great costs on the public. Today, few technologies are more potentially transformative and disruptive – and more potentially susceptible to abuse – than cryptocurrency,” researchers further implied.

And while the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is actively working towards regulating the crypto sector, if put into action, the Enforcement Framework can set clearer rules for the adoption of blockchain and ensure that investors are protected to trade digital assets in safe conditions.

Discussion
Related Coverage
Sam Bankman-Fried’s Trial Goes Into Day Two
  • The prosecution tried to paint FTX’s founder as someone who deliberately deceived his customers to get rich, and noted that he directed all activities that led to the failure of the company.
  • The defense’s claimed SBF was an entrepreneur whose plans simply “didn’t work out”, and tried to cast the blame for Alameda’s downfall to its former CEO Caroline Ellison.
October 5, 2023, 2:01 PM
SBF

Shutterstock

DoJ Says Lack of U.S. Crypto Laws Irrelevant in SBF Lawsuit
  • Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel had claimed he should not be charged with any crimes involving FTX as it was not regulated in the U.S., only FTX.US was.
  • The DoJ said the claim was irrelevant as SBF was charged for violating existing laws for misappropriating customer assets.
SBF Pushes Back Against DoJ Motion to Revoke Bail
  • SBF’s legal team argued that the former FTX CEO did not intend to tamper with the witnesses, and that the DoJ’s request was based on “thin” factual grounds.
  • The DoJ filed a motion last week requesting to dismiss SBF’s bail, alleging that he shared Caroline Ellison’s personal diary with the New York Times in order to intimidate her.