Tether Executives Investigated for Bank Fraud

  • “People with direct knowledge of the matter” told Bloomberg that Tether executives have received letters informing them of the investigation.
  • The sources also revealed the Department of Justice was looking into a “conduct that occurred years ago, when Tether was in its more nascent stages”.
Justice symbols on glossy table

Shutterstock

Officials from the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) are conducting an investigation into executives from Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin, alleging they could have committed bank fraud, Bloomberg reported on 26 July.

The publication cited “three people with direct knowledge of the matter”, who said the investigation is focused on an event that “occurred years ago”, when Tether was in its more nascent stages. One of the sources also revealed the DoJ has already sent letters to executives in the company, informing them they are the targets of an investigation. Bloomberg wrote:

“The notices signal that a decision on whether to bring a case could be made soon, with senior Justice Department officials ultimately determining whether charges are warranted.”

While it remains unknown what exactly the DoJ is probing for, Bloomberg’s sources stated that federal prosecutors were scrutinizing whether Tether made bank transactions without informing the bank the funds were linked to crypto.

Even though charges are yet to be made, Tether is no stranger to lawsuits. Back in 2019, Tether and crypto exchange Bitfinex were accused by the N.Y AG’s office of covering the “apparent loss of $850 million of co-mingled client and corporate funds”, but the investigation was paused. It was re-opened in July 2020, when the AG obtained information alleging that Tether used foreign organizations to handle customer deposits and withdrawals. The whole ordeal ended in February 2021, when Tether and Bitfinex agreed to cease any trading activity in the state, and also pay $18.5 million in penalties.

Discussion
Related Coverage
Sam Bankman-Fried’s Trial Goes Into Day Two
  • The prosecution tried to paint FTX’s founder as someone who deliberately deceived his customers to get rich, and noted that he directed all activities that led to the failure of the company.
  • The defense’s claimed SBF was an entrepreneur whose plans simply “didn’t work out”, and tried to cast the blame for Alameda’s downfall to its former CEO Caroline Ellison.
October 5, 2023, 2:01 PM
SBF

Shutterstock

DoJ Says Lack of U.S. Crypto Laws Irrelevant in SBF Lawsuit
  • Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel had claimed he should not be charged with any crimes involving FTX as it was not regulated in the U.S., only FTX.US was.
  • The DoJ said the claim was irrelevant as SBF was charged for violating existing laws for misappropriating customer assets.
SBF Pushes Back Against DoJ Motion to Revoke Bail
  • SBF’s legal team argued that the former FTX CEO did not intend to tamper with the witnesses, and that the DoJ’s request was based on “thin” factual grounds.
  • The DoJ filed a motion last week requesting to dismiss SBF’s bail, alleging that he shared Caroline Ellison’s personal diary with the New York Times in order to intimidate her.