Elon Musk Pulls Out of $44B Twitter Deal

  • Musk’s letter noted Twitter had failed to provide him with crucial information for the past 2 months, and that preliminary analysis indicates that fake accounts on the platform were “wildly higher than 5%”.
  • Twitter’s board is definitely not happy with Musk, noting it was looking to close the transaction even if it had to pursue legal action against Tesla’s CEO.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk in California City

Tesla CEO Elon Musk in California City, California, USA on 14 December 2020. Shutterstock

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has decided to pull out from his $44 billion deal to acquire Twitter, claiming the social media giant had provided him with false and misleading information.

The announcement was made in a letter addressed to Twitter’s chief legal officer Vijaya Gadde on 8 July — and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) — in which Musk explains he is terminating the merger agreement due to Twitter breaching multiple provisions of the deal. The letter also noted that the social media giant “appears to have made false and misleading representations” that Musk had relied upon before making his decision to purchase the company.

The letter claims that among other things, Twitter has not been very clear about two pieces of data that were important to the deal, those being its “process for auditing the inclusion of spam and fake accounts” in monetizable daily active users (mDAU), and its “process for identifying and suspending spam and fake accounts”. The letter reads:

“Twitter has not provided information that Mr. Musk has requested for nearly two months notwithstanding his repeated, detailed clarifications intended to simplify Twitter’s identification, collection, and disclosure of the most relevant information sought in Mr. Musk’s original requests.”

One of the main reasons Musk signed the merger agreement was Twitter’s claims that it had fewer than 5% fake and spam accounts on its platform. While the social media giant has yet to provide complete information on that claim, a preliminary analysis of the data has lead Musk to “strongly believe that the proportion of false and spam accounts included in the reported mDAU count is wildly higher than 5%”.

While Twitter’s board originally disagreed with Musk’s plan to buy the company — adopting a “poison pill” tactic at the time to counter his takeover — it now appears they are set on completing the transaction. Twitter chairman Bret Taylor quickly responded to Musk’s letter, saying the board was “committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon”, and that it plans to pursue legal action to enforce the merger agreement.

Discussion
Related Coverage
Vitalik Says X Account Hacked Via SIM-Swap
  • Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has regained his T-Mobile account, which on Saturday was compromised by hackers and used to take over his X account.
  • On 9 September, hackers used a SIM-swap attack to take over Buterin’s X account, and siphon close to $700,000 in crypto by promoting a fake NFT giveaway.
September 12, 2023, 1:33 PM
Vitalik Buterin Proposes Creating an Ether Mixer

Ethereum co-founder and Vitalik Buterin speaks during TechCrunch Disrupt. 18 September, 2017, San Francisco, California.Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

Social App Friend.tech Generates Over $1.4M in Fees in 24h
  • Although it was launched in beta on 10 August, the platform has already entered the list of top three fee generating crypto projects by earning $1.42 million in 24 hours.
  • Friend.tech is a social app integrated with X (formerly Twitter) that allows users to sell and buy tokenized shares of their social network, gaining access to exclusive content and private chat rooms.
KuCoin Twitter Account Hacked, Exchange to Reimburse Losses
  • The Twitter account of the crypto exchange was compromised for roughly 45 minutes on Monday, resulting in 22 transactions connected to the hack.
  • KuCoin has calculated that the total asset losses were 22,638 USDT, and noted that it will fully reimburse users affected in the incident.