Craig Wright Claims Ownership of Stolen BTC From Mt. Gox, Receives Legal Notice From Victim

  • The self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin has claimed someone stole the private keys to wallets containing 110,000 BTC, which have been connected to the Mt. Gox hack.
  • A victim of the hack has sent legal notice to Wright, saying he may take legal action against Wright if he admits ownership of the 1Feex wallet, and demand compensation.
Craig Wright

Craig Wright. The Cryptonomist

The self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin has moved from threatening to sue websites that host the BTC whitepaper, to demanding access to wallets connected to the Mt. Gox hack.

On Tuesday a law firm representing Wright, Ontier LLP, sent a “Letter Before Action” to Bitcoin Core contributors, demanding access to two wallets — containing 31,000 BTC and 79,957 BTC — claiming Wright lost the private keys to the addresses during a hack on his computer last year. In its letter, Ontier LLP claims the developers have a legal duty “under English law” to provide access and control of these addresses to Wright’s Tulip Trading Ltd. (TTL), and take all “reasonable steps to ensure that TTL has access to and control of the BTC in the Addresses”.

The legal firm further said the letter was addressed to “those in a position to remedy” Wright’s loss, even though those same Bitcoin Core contributors have no control over the network’s wallets. In fact, in order for the “request” to be completed the contributors will have to either reorganize Bitcoins history with a 51% attack — which is impossible — or fork the blockchain.

While we cannot be sure, it is unlikely that either of these options will be executed. There is also something peculiar about one of the wallets Wright claims ownership of, it is connected to the 800,000 BTC hack on Mt. Gox exchange. This has resulted in an unusual situation, where Wright is not the one to take legal actions, but receive threats of a legal action against him.

After claiming ownership of the BTC contained in the 1Feex address — which received funds stolen from Mt. Gox — Wright was presented with a legal notice from a law firm representing Danny Brewster, a victim of the Mt. Gox exchange hack. In the letter, the law firm argues that Brewster has an “equitable interest in the Bitcoin held at the 1Feex address”. The letter reads:

“You and your clients Tulip Trust Limited and Craig Steven Wright, and their agents, are hereby placed on notice that our client and many others similarly situated have an equitable interest in the Bitcoin held at 1Feex address in an amount not less than, and likely exceeding, $17,500,000. Your client owes our client, and likely others, a legal and equitable duty to hold any funds received by your client on either the BTC main chain or any fork of the Bitcoin chain.”

It is likely that Brewster’s legal charges are a way to force Wright to admit he had never owned the 1Feex address. The letter states that if Wright formally confirms he had no control over the address at any point in time by 1 March, then the two parties could “avoid any unnecessary litigation”.

Wright has been trying to prove he is the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, for years now, even though he is yet to present hard evidence in his favor.

Discussion
2 comments
Loading comments...
Related Coverage
Wright’s Threat Backfires, More Websites Hosting BTC Whitepaper
  • Craig Wright has threatened the owners of Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org with legal action if they don’t remove the BTC whitepaper from their websites.
  • In response to the threat, even more websites have started uploading the file, including Facebook’s subsidiary Novi and payments giant Square, to name a few.
January 21, 2021, 9:10 PM
Idiot businessman self-sabotaging

Image from Shutterstock

Timeline: Craig Wright’s Story So Far
  • Though the Australian has claimed, multiple times, that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, he has yet to provide any concrete proof.
  • Wright’s story has been revolving mostly around the debunking of multiple “proofs” of him being Satoshi, his role in the Bitcoin Cash split, a multi-billion dollar lawsuit, and his patent trolling company.